Historic images age just like humans, but they never disappear. We read of slavery and war in textbooks, but none of us truly know the extent of these events. In the movie Ethnic Notions, produced and directed by Marlon Riggs, I witnessed a lot of ignorance as well as racism. It was a movie showing the way blacks were portrayed in history. The movie opened showing cartoon images of blacks eating watermelon while singing and dancing, along with a distorted view of what they look like. Many cartoons and movies showed the idea that blacks were actually happy being slaves; sort of “friends” with their masters, part of the family, playing with the master’s children and having fun. During this time, whites would even imitate blacks for comedy as well as play the part of blacks in movies.
“Mamie” is a term used to describe black women who were slaves; they were portrayed as larger women, wearing bandannas over their hair. They were always seen as happy women, singing and loving slavery. These women were very protective of the household they’re a part of and they’re said to be strong, happy and ugly. This is due to the fact that if she were to be pretty, this would be a threat to the wife of the household. Views of black children were also distorted. They were made out to be animal like and savage like. These images of blacks are still with us today. On bottles of syrup, Aunt Jemima is black and wearing a bandanna, just like “Mamie.” Even though these images are false perceptions, why do they continue to be a part of today’s society?
While watching this movie, I felt very uncomfortable and uneasy. I was looking around and noticed others who seemed to feel the same. We were told we may laugh at some of the things in the video, but I just felt nervous. It worries me that these false, hurtful images of blacks are still around. This is probably the case with many other races, but it something that shouldn’t be an issue after all these years. If this is the case, why do we still see and hear all of this hatred and negativity?
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Takaki CH. 3: Question
Why is it that both whites and blacks were slaves, yet white slaves still held a higher status in society than blacks? Shouldn’t being a slave or a servant be grounds for receiving the same treatment?
Monday, February 12, 2007
Takaki CH. 3: The "Giddy Multitude"
As humans, we associate different words and images with different aspects in our lives. To the English, the color black became intertwined with images such as, “deeply stained with dirt,” “foul,” “malignant,” “sinister,” as well as “wicked.” These images were imbedded in the minds of the English during the 1500s and the 1600s. The image portrayed of the color white was that it “signified purity, innocence, and goodness.” Color was of great importance to many people during this time period and this affected thoughts dealing with white and black laborers. “Coming from different shores, white and black laborers in Virginia had very limited understanding as well as negative notions of each other, and mutual feelings of fear and hostility undoubtedly existed” (55). This shows that both whites and blacks had things in common and nothing in common at the same time. Whites and blacks experienced day-to-day exhaustion from the work they were forced to do. Sometimes, blacks and whites would run away together. This was looked at as negative because whites were still looked at as superior to blacks, even if they were doing the same labor. Also, blacks and whites were caught forming other kinds of partnerships. Sexual relations between blacks and whites held grounds for harsh punishment. This happened on numerous occasions and pregnancy often followed these relations. Blacks would be punished more harshly that whites if caught with each other.
African laborers became “more valuable” than English indentured servants. “What was happening was evident: Africans, unlike whites, were being degraded into a condition of servitude for life and even the status of property” (57). African laborers were able to be shipped over in large groups, which was cheaper and they were able to serve their masters for longer periods of time. The “giddy multitude” allowed white slaves to be pardoned. Religion and race showed the division between savagery and civilization. People felt that “if the gates fell, the colonists feared, so would civilization.” Takaki asks a good question, “Why was there such a dramatic turn away from white indentured servants and toward enslaved blacks?” Having these Africans “bound for life” is an advantage. Laws were passed which institutionalized slavery of blacks because it was the cheapest.
Learning about this history of slavery really opened my eyes to what it was like. White and black laborers were, at one time, treated equally. They had the same punishments and the same labors. Why is it that we always tend to hear about the slavery of blacks in history, instead of the story behind both blacks and whites? It was interesting to learn the similarities and differences between the labors enforced on blacks and whites, as well as their punishments and laws passed favored whites. I learned a lot of new facts while reading this chapter.
African laborers became “more valuable” than English indentured servants. “What was happening was evident: Africans, unlike whites, were being degraded into a condition of servitude for life and even the status of property” (57). African laborers were able to be shipped over in large groups, which was cheaper and they were able to serve their masters for longer periods of time. The “giddy multitude” allowed white slaves to be pardoned. Religion and race showed the division between savagery and civilization. People felt that “if the gates fell, the colonists feared, so would civilization.” Takaki asks a good question, “Why was there such a dramatic turn away from white indentured servants and toward enslaved blacks?” Having these Africans “bound for life” is an advantage. Laws were passed which institutionalized slavery of blacks because it was the cheapest.
Learning about this history of slavery really opened my eyes to what it was like. White and black laborers were, at one time, treated equally. They had the same punishments and the same labors. Why is it that we always tend to hear about the slavery of blacks in history, instead of the story behind both blacks and whites? It was interesting to learn the similarities and differences between the labors enforced on blacks and whites, as well as their punishments and laws passed favored whites. I learned a lot of new facts while reading this chapter.
Monday, February 5, 2007
Zinn CH. 2: Drawing the Color Line
The United States have a long history of racism, which makes this a very important topic of discussion. There is no other country in the world that has experienced more racism than the U.S. In chapter 2, Zinn asks a few essential questions: How did it start? How might it end? Is it possible for whites and blacks to live together without hatred? Most of these questions have never been fully answered, but in this chapter, Zinn helps us to grasp a better understanding of racisms’ history. In 1619, people of Virginia needed people for labor. It was too much work for them to grow enough to survive. Although turning to the Indians (like Columbus) for this kind of help might have seemed like a good idea, the Virginians were outnumbered, canceling out this option. They came to the realization that the use of black slaves would work. It was illegal at the time, but it had gone on for hundreds of years; black slavery. A reason for this enslavement was due to their helplessness from being ripped from their land and culture. Their culture wasn’t inferior to others, it was even “more admirable” in some ways. Slavery was also used in Africa, as well as Europeans. It’s stated that the slaves which were in Africa were more like the majority of Europe’s population. “African slavery lacked two elements that made American slavery the most cruel form of slavery in history: the frenzy for limitless profit that comes from capitalistic agriculture, the reduction of the slave to less than human status by the use of racial hatred, with that relentless clarity based on color, where white was master, black was slave” (25-26). The conditions the pre-traded slaves had to go through were unbearable for many. Marching for thousands of miles and being packed on a ship so tightly that they are practically suffocating are just a few of these awful conditions. Although this sounds terrible, the slave traders found it all to be “worthwhile.”
The Dutch were the first to dominate the slave trade, followed by the English. Americans over in New England even began to trade slaves. “By 1800, ten to fifteen million blacks had been transported as slaves to the Americas, representing perhaps one-third of those originally seized in Africa (26). Unequal treatment became an issue, which is part of what racism means. Zinn states that there is even evidence showing both whites and blacks seeming more equal than we may think. Common problem, work and enemy (their master) make blacks and whites somewhat similar. In 1763, about half of the population became enslaved. Punishments were harsh for running away and other things. “From time to time, whites were involved in the slave resistance” (30). I feel that this is a very important aspect in this chapter. This seemed to be what people feared most; whites and blacks rebelling together to overthrow power.
To go back to one of Zinn’s questions, Is it possible for whites and blacks to live together without hatred among each other? I believe that it is. I feel that no matter what, we will have certain people of different races who have issues and are racist, but I don’t feel it’s fair that being called racist should be thrown around. There are so many people who don’t see race as an issue, and each decade improves with less feelings of hate. Although there is still so much racism in our society, I believe that one day people will look past that and learn to understand each other for who we are.
The Dutch were the first to dominate the slave trade, followed by the English. Americans over in New England even began to trade slaves. “By 1800, ten to fifteen million blacks had been transported as slaves to the Americas, representing perhaps one-third of those originally seized in Africa (26). Unequal treatment became an issue, which is part of what racism means. Zinn states that there is even evidence showing both whites and blacks seeming more equal than we may think. Common problem, work and enemy (their master) make blacks and whites somewhat similar. In 1763, about half of the population became enslaved. Punishments were harsh for running away and other things. “From time to time, whites were involved in the slave resistance” (30). I feel that this is a very important aspect in this chapter. This seemed to be what people feared most; whites and blacks rebelling together to overthrow power.
To go back to one of Zinn’s questions, Is it possible for whites and blacks to live together without hatred among each other? I believe that it is. I feel that no matter what, we will have certain people of different races who have issues and are racist, but I don’t feel it’s fair that being called racist should be thrown around. There are so many people who don’t see race as an issue, and each decade improves with less feelings of hate. Although there is still so much racism in our society, I believe that one day people will look past that and learn to understand each other for who we are.
Johnson CH. 7: How Systems of Privilege Work EXTRA CREDIT BLOG
In chapter 7, Johnson points out that people’s participation in social systems allow privilege and oppression to exist. Who people are and how they’re shaped comes from different paths of least resistance. The systems we make and their consequences happen through these paths. Three key characteristics are held by systems which are organized around privilege. “They are dominated by privileged groups, identified with privileged groups, and centered on privileged groups. All three characteristics support the idea that members of privileged groups are superior to those below them and, therefore, deserve their privilege” (90). Patriarchy is a concept acknowledged in this chapter. This is male-dominated, male-identified, and male-centered. Everything pretty much revolves around the male gender in a patriarchal society. Then there’s race privilege. This exists through systems which are white-dominated, white-identified, and white-centered.
Dominance is an important theme in this chapter. “When we say that a system is dominated by a privileged group, it means that positions of power tend to be occupied by members of that group” (91). This is typically the way our society works. Power is something else that becomes identified with people in ways in which it seems normal. Identifying a system as male-dominated doesn’t necessarily mean that all men are powerful. Johnson makes a very good point when he says, men are dominate, but if you ask a man if he is, he will usually answer saying no because he is not of class, race, or disability status. There is a difference between men and woman when it comes to dominance. Male dominance is the norm. If a man in an office setting is upper level management, it is considered normal. He will tell many people what to do, including women. On the other hand, if a woman is upper level management, she is considered to be more of a “bitch” because her actions are somewhat bossy for a woman. Another aspect of this chapter is being identified with privilege. A commonly used “saying” used by millions is, “It’s a man’s world.” Other possibilities are, “It’s a white world,” or “It’s a straight world.” These are all groups with privilege. One would not be likely to use an oppressed group in the same phrase. “Patterns of dominance and the paths of least resistance that sustain them show up in every system of privilege. The result of such patterns of dominance is that if you’re female, of color or in some other way on the outside of privilege, when you look upward in all kinds of power structures you don’t see people like you (94-95). If our participation within society’s social systems never happened, privilege and oppression wouldn’t exist.
Dominance is an important theme in this chapter. “When we say that a system is dominated by a privileged group, it means that positions of power tend to be occupied by members of that group” (91). This is typically the way our society works. Power is something else that becomes identified with people in ways in which it seems normal. Identifying a system as male-dominated doesn’t necessarily mean that all men are powerful. Johnson makes a very good point when he says, men are dominate, but if you ask a man if he is, he will usually answer saying no because he is not of class, race, or disability status. There is a difference between men and woman when it comes to dominance. Male dominance is the norm. If a man in an office setting is upper level management, it is considered normal. He will tell many people what to do, including women. On the other hand, if a woman is upper level management, she is considered to be more of a “bitch” because her actions are somewhat bossy for a woman. Another aspect of this chapter is being identified with privilege. A commonly used “saying” used by millions is, “It’s a man’s world.” Other possibilities are, “It’s a white world,” or “It’s a straight world.” These are all groups with privilege. One would not be likely to use an oppressed group in the same phrase. “Patterns of dominance and the paths of least resistance that sustain them show up in every system of privilege. The result of such patterns of dominance is that if you’re female, of color or in some other way on the outside of privilege, when you look upward in all kinds of power structures you don’t see people like you (94-95). If our participation within society’s social systems never happened, privilege and oppression wouldn’t exist.
Johnson CH. 6: What It All Has to Do with Us
This chapter deals with the concept of diversity, among other things. Johnson believes that people don’t talk about the problem of privilege because it feels too risky. He said that feelings of discomfort and fear hold us back long enough for us to find a way to deal with the problems of even talking about privilege. What people don’t know is that the risk isn’t as big as it may seem. There is a universal human fear, which happens to deal with strangeness and being unfamiliar with certain aspects. This whole problem stems from “the way people think about things and who they are in relation to them” (76). Privilege holds its own certain path with diversity. People are unlikely to cross diversity lines to offer opportunities or privilege to others, which means they’re more likely to do this with someone of equal privilege.
Sexism and individualism are brought together to help get a better understanding of what Johnson is talking about in this chapter. As individuals, we think that everything has to do with individuals and has nothing to do with social categories. “If we use individualism to explain sexism, for example, it’s hard to avoid the idea that sexism exists simply because men are sexist – men have sexist feeling, beliefs, needs, and motivations that lead them to behave in sexist ways” (77). Using this concept to talk about privilege doesn’t work because it’s what causes the circular motion of never solving the problem. This also uses the blame game because it allows everything bad in life to be seen as somebody’s fault. This individualistic way of thinking makes us unaware or blind to the fact the privilege even exists. Johnson states that “privilege, by definition, has nothing to do with individuals, only with the social categories we wind up in.”
The path of least resistance is another main concept discussed by Johnson. In society, we have institutions, socialization any many other aspects that individualize us. In most cases, it is likely that if given options, we will choose the path of least resistance. By this, Johnson means making our decisions based on what people “normally” do. He gives the example of being in an elevator. Once you walk in, people are likely to turn back around and face the door so when it opens, they are able to walk straight out. This is considered a path of least resistance because that is the norm in today’s society. People need to realize that there is a problem with privilege before we can take steps to change it. It is better to look at social categories in general, than blaming things on individuals. Our world is much too big it be placing blame on certain people day by day.
I really learned something from Johnson’s final paragraph of chapter 6. “As long as we participate in social systems, we don’t get to choose whether to be involved in the consequences they produce. We’re involved simple through the fact that we’re here. As such, we can only choose how to be involved, whether to be just part of the problem or also to be part of the solution. That’s where our power lies, and also our responsibility” (89).
Sexism and individualism are brought together to help get a better understanding of what Johnson is talking about in this chapter. As individuals, we think that everything has to do with individuals and has nothing to do with social categories. “If we use individualism to explain sexism, for example, it’s hard to avoid the idea that sexism exists simply because men are sexist – men have sexist feeling, beliefs, needs, and motivations that lead them to behave in sexist ways” (77). Using this concept to talk about privilege doesn’t work because it’s what causes the circular motion of never solving the problem. This also uses the blame game because it allows everything bad in life to be seen as somebody’s fault. This individualistic way of thinking makes us unaware or blind to the fact the privilege even exists. Johnson states that “privilege, by definition, has nothing to do with individuals, only with the social categories we wind up in.”
The path of least resistance is another main concept discussed by Johnson. In society, we have institutions, socialization any many other aspects that individualize us. In most cases, it is likely that if given options, we will choose the path of least resistance. By this, Johnson means making our decisions based on what people “normally” do. He gives the example of being in an elevator. Once you walk in, people are likely to turn back around and face the door so when it opens, they are able to walk straight out. This is considered a path of least resistance because that is the norm in today’s society. People need to realize that there is a problem with privilege before we can take steps to change it. It is better to look at social categories in general, than blaming things on individuals. Our world is much too big it be placing blame on certain people day by day.
I really learned something from Johnson’s final paragraph of chapter 6. “As long as we participate in social systems, we don’t get to choose whether to be involved in the consequences they produce. We’re involved simple through the fact that we’re here. As such, we can only choose how to be involved, whether to be just part of the problem or also to be part of the solution. That’s where our power lies, and also our responsibility” (89).
Johnson CH. 5: The Trouble with the Trouble
In Chapter 5, Johnson states that dominant groups don’t look at privilege as a problem. It is crucial that members of privileged groups start to see both privilege and oppression as a problem instead of nonexistent. If this realization never comes to be, then privilege will never progress to be resolved in the future of society. One reason dominant groups don’t view privilege as a problem is because they don’t know it exists in the first place. “The reality of privilege doesn’t occur to them because they don’t go out of their way to see it or ask about it because no one dares bring it up for fear of making things worse” (68). Being ignorant of this reality allows people to go on with their lives without having to deal with the problem. Another reason is because they don’t have to. Paying attention to any kind of trouble doesn’t happen unless perhaps it’s pointed out. The next reason is because they think it’s just a personal problem. These dominant groups believe that people get what they deserve. Johnson uses an example, “This means that if whites or males get more than others, it’s because they have it coming – they work harder, they’re smarter, more capable. If other people get less, it’s up to them to do something about it” (69-70). Moving on, the next reason why dominant groups don’t look at privilege as a problem is because they want to hang on to their privilege. Prejudice also takes part in this ignorance, as well as being afraid. People are afraid of blame in general, but dominant groups are afraid of “being blamed if they acknowledge that it exists.”
Johnson mentions the tin cup approach, which is “an appeal made to privileged people’s sense of decency and fairness, their good will toward those less fortunate than themselves” (71). The do-a-good-deed approach is also brought up, as well as the business case approach. It is safe to say that there would be no future for privilege and oppression if the dominant groups actually saw these concepts as a problem. I think that this is a major issue in today’s society. The point is, if a person is privileged in one aspect of their life, they are most likely oppressed in another aspect. These dominant groups don’t have the right to use their privilege to ignore this problem all together. People should become more aware of their privileges in life, but they should be sure not to use that to make anyone feel worthless or low.
Johnson mentions the tin cup approach, which is “an appeal made to privileged people’s sense of decency and fairness, their good will toward those less fortunate than themselves” (71). The do-a-good-deed approach is also brought up, as well as the business case approach. It is safe to say that there would be no future for privilege and oppression if the dominant groups actually saw these concepts as a problem. I think that this is a major issue in today’s society. The point is, if a person is privileged in one aspect of their life, they are most likely oppressed in another aspect. These dominant groups don’t have the right to use their privilege to ignore this problem all together. People should become more aware of their privileges in life, but they should be sure not to use that to make anyone feel worthless or low.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
